Diklik gençliğin ve tazeliğin simgesidir.Tüm doğada bunu yakından görebiliriz. Yaşamın başlamasıyla birlikte yer çekimine karşı savaşta başarının ölçüsü dikliktir. Zaman içinde insan vücudundaki dokularda yer çekiminin etkisiyle sarkmaya başlar.

Sarkan meme dokusu daha yukarıya çekilerek sabitlenmektedir.Mastopexy denilen bu ameliyat yöntemi birden fazla tekniğe sahiptir. Sizin için en uygun olanını hekiminizle kararlaştırmaktasınız.Özellikle sık sık kilo alıp verenlerle, küçük memeli kadınların gebelik sonrasında sarkma oluşmaktadır.Bu ameliyatlarda meme başı etrafındaki renkli deri de(areola ) küçültülebilmektedir.

Göğüs dikleştirme vaya toparlama ameliyatlarından sonra sütyen veya bikini altından izlerin görünmemesi cerrahi teknik açıdan önemlidir.

Sayfa içeriği sadece bilgilendirme amaçlıdır, tanı ve tedavi için mutlaka doktorunuza başvurunuz.

                                                          Referanslar

1.Current Trends and Controversies in Breast Augmentation

David A. Hidalgo, M.D. Sammy Sinno, M.D. New York, N.Y.

From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical

College; and the Department of Plastic Surgery, New York

University Medical CenterCopyright © 2016 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons

2.(2011)Use of Deepithelialized Flap in Mammoplasties: Simple Method With Excellent Results Jan Mestak • Andrej Sukop • Ondrej Mestak 24 April 2011 / Published online: 24 May

Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery (2011) 64, 1401e1409Saint-Cyr M, Dauwe P, Wong C, Thakar H, Nagarkar P, Rohrich RJ

2.(2010) Use of the serratus anterior fascia flap for expander coverage in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:1057–1064

3. http://www.plasticsurgery.org/Media/Press_Releases/ASPS_Reports_Cosmetic_Plastic_Surgery_Down_In_2009_Up_69_In_

First_Decade_of_New_Millennium_.html [accessed 12 08 2010].

4. Cunningham B, McCue J. Safety and effectiveness of Mentor’s MemoryGel implants at 6 years. Aesth Plast Surg 2009;33:

5. http://www.allergan.com/products/medical_aesthetics/natrelle_collection.htm.

6. Tebbetts JB. A system for breast implant selection based on patient tissue characteristics and implant-soft tissue dynamics. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:1410e5.

7. Bengtson BP, Van Natta BW, Murphy DK, et al. Style 410 highly cohesive silicone breast implant core study results at 3 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120:40Se8S.

8. Tebbetts JB. Achieving a zero percent reoperation rate at 3 years in a 50-consecutive-case augmentation mammaplasty premarket approval. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118:1453e7.

9. Adams Jr WP. The process of breast augmentation: four sequential steps for optimizing outcomes for patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;122:1892e900.

10. Tebbetts JB. Dimensional augmentation mammaplasty using the BioDimensional system. Santa Barbara Calif. McGhan Med Corporation; 1994:1e90.

11. Tebbetts JB, Tebbetts TB. The best breast CosmetXpertise;1999. Dallas.

12. Hsia HC, Thomson JG. Differences in breast shape preferences

between surgeons and patients seeking breast augmentation.Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;112:312e20.

13. Brody GS. The perfect breast: is it attainable? Does it exist?Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;113:1500e3.

14. Hammond D. BodyLogic presentation. Chicago: QMP Symposium;

September 2008.

15. Penn J. Breast reduction. Br J Plast Surg 1955;7:357e71.

16. Westreich M. Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocoland results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;100:468e79.

17. Blondeel PN, Hijjawi J, Depypere H, Roche N, Van Landuyt K.Shaping the breast in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery: an easy three-step principle. Part IV-aesthetic breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124:372e82.

19. Moufarre`ge R. Anatomical and artistic breast considerations. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2005;50:365e70.

20. van Aalst JA, Phillips JD, Sadove AM. Pediatric chest wall and reast deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124(1S):38ee49e.